A consolidated, AI-driven view of financial strength across every rated company in this industry — ranked by Economic Capital Ratio, with the causal reasoning behind each score.
Aggregate ECR metrics across every ranked company, by year. Click a point to jump to that year.
Headline figures for this industry and year.
All 26 rated companies in US Recreation, 2025.
| #↑ | Company | Seal | Economic Capital Ratio | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ★ Top rated | — | ||
| 2 | ★ Top rated | ▲ 25 | ||
| 3 | ★ Top rated | — | ||
| 4 | Parks America INC | ★ Top rated | ▲ 1 | |
| 5 | Allied Gaming Entertainment Inc | ★ Top rated | ▼ 1 | |
| 6 | Scworx Corp | ★ Top rated | ▲ 19 | |
| 7 | Butler National CORP | ▲ 6 | ||
| 8 | Live Nation Entertainment Inc | ▲ 1 | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | |||
| 10 | — | |||
| 11 | ▲ 3 | |||
| 12 | Accel Entertainment Inc | ▲ 5 | ||
| 13 | ▲ 3 | |||
| 14 | ▲ 4 | |||
| 15 | ▲ 6 | |||
| 16 | Draftkings Inc | ▲ 7 | ||
| 17 | Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp | ▲ 7 | ||
| 18 | Planet Fitness Inc | ▲ 4 | ||
| 19 | Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp | ▲ 1 | ||
| 20 | Madison Square Garden Sports Corp | ▲ 8 | ||
| 21 | Gamesquare Holdings Inc | ▲ 8 | ||
| 22 | Safespace Global Corp | ▲ 11 | ||
| 23 | Super League Enterprise Inc | ▲ 7 | ||
| 24 | — 0 | |||
| 25 | Mobile Global Esports Inc | ▲ 9 |
How the RealRate model weighs this industry — feature impact, importance, and fit.
The Feature Distribution shows the main industry variables and the distribution of their impact on financial strength. The more important a variable, the broader the distribution. As the effects are calculated relative to the industry average, half of the companies have a positive effect (green) and half have a negative effect (red).
The Feature Importance Graph highlights the most important industry features for the industry. These variables have the greatest impact on financial health, shown as the last variable at the bottom of the causal graph.
The Regression Plot compares the forecasted company valuation with the observed stock market values. A positive correlation suggests that the model effectively explains market prices.